Overseas Investment
Liberalized further
The following overseas investment related transactions
have now been permitted under the Automatic Route of the RBI:-
Guarantees
Indian entities may offer any forms of guarantee
- corporate or personal / primary or collateral / guarantee
by the promoter company / guarantee by group company, sister
concern or associate company in India, provided that the financial
commitments are within the overall limit of 200% of the networth
of the investing company
.
Disinvestment
Indian parties may disinvest, including write off
part of the original investment without prior approval of
the Reserve Bank, in the following categories:
i) in cases where the JV / WOS is listed in the overseas stock
exchange.
ii) in cases where the Indian promoter company is listed on
a stock exchange in India and has a networth of not less than
Rs.100 crore.
iii) where the Indian promoter is an unlisted company and
the investment in overseas venture does not exceed USD 10
million.
Overseas Investment by Proprietorship Concerns
It has been decided to allow proprietary / unregistered
partnership firms to set up a JV/WOS outside India with prior
approval of Reserve Bank.
Special Economic Zone Rules,
2006 Notified
Pursuant to the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Act,
2005 the Rules thereof have been notified, opening the floodgates
to making the SEZ dream a reality thru the Private- Public
Partnership model. An SEZ is a designated duty free enclave,
to be treated as a foreign territory for trade operations
and duty and tariffs.
The main features of the SEZ Rules, as far as developing
SEZ’s are concerned are as follows:-
| Sl.
No. |
Type
of SEZ |
Min.
Area Reqd.
(contiguous area) |
Land
Use Restriction |
Remarks |
| 1 |
Multi Product |
1000 hectares |
25% to be earmarked for developing
processing zone |
1.
Developer or co-developer to have a min. of 26%
equity in the SPV formed, if any to create business,
residential or recreational facilities in a SEZ
2. The developer shall not sell the land in
a SEZ- only lease permitted.
|
| 2 |
SEZ Located at Assam, Meghalaya,
Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Manipur,
Tripura, Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Sikkim,
Jammu and Kashmir, Goa or in a Union Territory |
200 hectares |
25% to be earmarked
for developing processing zone |
| 3 |
Ports or airports |
100 hectares |
50% to be earmarked for developing
processing zone |
| 4 |
Electronic Hardware
and Software, ITES |
10 hectares |
Min. built up processing area
of 100,000 sq. mtrs. And 50% to be earmarked for
developing processing zone |
| 5 |
Bio-tech, non-conventional
energy, gems or jewellery sector |
10 hectares |
50% to be earmarked for developing
processing zone |
| 6 |
Sector Specific SEZ located
at Assam, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh,
Mizoram, Manipur, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal,
Sikkim, Jammu and Kashmir, Goa or in a Union Territory |
50 hectares |
50% to be earmarked
for developing processing zone |
| 7 |
Free Trade and
Warehousing |
40 hectares |
Min. built up processing area
of 100,000 sq. mtrs. |
| 8 |
Free Trade and Warehousing
Zone as part of a Multi Product SEZ |
- |
- |
| 9 |
Free Trade and
Warehousing Zone as part of a Sector Specific
SEZ |
- |
Max area of such Zone not
to exceed 20% of the processing Zone |
|
 |
FDI in Retail Trade Opened for ‘Single
Brand’ Products
The Government has notified the opening of the retail
trade sector and allowed FDI under the Approval route subject
to the following conditions:-
i.) Products to be sold should be of a ‘Single Brand’
only.
ii.) Products should be sold under the same brand internationally.
iii.) ‘Single Brand’ product-retailing would cover
only products which are branded during manufacturing.
E-filing before the Registrar of Companies-
a reality
Under the E-Governance initiative of the Ministry of Company
Affairs (MCA), MCA21 has been introduced and new electronic
forms have been notified with effect from February 28, 2006.
Under it all filing will be done electronically, due to which
various changes are being introduced. Few of the major changes
being introduced are as follows:-
| 1. |
An
existing Director/ person intending to become a Director
is require to make an application to MCA for allotment
of a unique identification, namely, Director Identification
Number (DIN). It is intended to be a lifetime number |
| 2. |
A
Digital Signature Certificate that shows the authenticity
of the person signing the same is required by every
used who is required to sign an eForm. The persons
requiring Digital Signatures include the company representatives,
professionals and others who are required to affix
digital signatures for submitting an eForm. |
| 3. |
Payment
can be made with electronically using Credit Card
or Internet Banking options or ohysically using the
Challan option. |
Enhancement of the Foreign Direct
Investment ceiling from 49 per cent to 74 per cent in the
Telecom sector:
In pursuance of the Government’s commitment to liberalise
the FDI regime, it has been decided to enhance the Foreign
Direct Investment ceiling from 49 per cent to 74 per cent
in certain telecom services [such as Basic, Cellular, Unified
Access Services, National/International Long Distance, V-Sat,
Public Mobile Radio Trunked Services (PMRTS), Global Mobile
Personal Communications Services (GMPCS) and other value added
services], subject to the certain conditions.
(November
3, 2005)
Rajya Sabha Passed The National Tax
Tribunal Bill, 2005
The Rajya Sabha today passed the National Tax Tribunal
(NTT) Bill, 2005. The Bill provides for adjudication by the
National Tax Tribunal of Disputes with respect to levy, assessment,
collection and enforcement of direct taxes and it also provides
for the adjudication of disputes with respect to the determination
of rates of duties of customs and central excise on goods
and the valuation of goods for the purposes of assessment
of such duties as well as in matters relating to levy of tax
on service, in pursuance of Article 323 B of the Constitution
and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
The Lok Sabha had earlier passed the Bill.
 |
The Bill extends to the whole of India and shall come into
force on such date as the Central Government may notify in
the Official Gazette of Government of India. The NTT shall
consist of a Chairperson and such number of members as the
Central Government deems fit. The Central Government shall
determine the number of Benches and each Bench shall consist
of two members. The Chairperson of the NTT shall be a person
who has been a Judge of the Supreme Court or Chief Justice
of High Court. The member shall be a person who is eligible
to be a Judge of a High Court or who is or has been a member
of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal or of the Customs, Excise
and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal for at least seven years.
The Chairperson and other members shall be appointed by the
Central Government on the recommendations of the Selection
Committee consisting of Chief Justice of India, or a Judge
of the Supreme Court nominated by CJI, Secretary, Department
of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice and Secretary,
Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. The retirement
age in respect of the Chairperson shall be 68 years and in
respect of a member shall be 65 years.
(December 8, 2005)
Clarification on ELSS
The Finance Ministry on Tuesday clarified that tax benefit
under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act would be available
to the investments made on or after April 1,2005 in the units
of a mutual fund issued under any plan formulated in accordance
with the three equity-linked savings (ELSS) schemes —
ELSS 1992, ELSS 1992 as modified in 1998 and ELSS 2005.
(December
14, 2005)
India- Mauritius tax treaty
may be reviewed:
India and Mauritius held a first round of discussion on a
Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Partnership Agreement (CECPA)
in August. As part of the ensuing talks, India has proposed
a re-negotiation of the existing India- Mauritius tax treaty
so as to include safeguards against third country residents
from enjoying benefits under the treaty.
The move followed the recent signing of the India- Singapore
Comprehensive Economic Co-operation Agreement (CECA), which
threatens to reduce the importance of Mauritius as the investment
gateway to India. If Mauritius agrees to re-negotiations of
the tax treaty, India may push to incorporate the “limitation
on benefits” clause to regulate the usage of conduit
companies for claiming treaty benefits. The recently amended
Indo- Singapore treaty which comes ointo effect from August
1, 2005 provides for a limited version of “limitation
on benefits” clause.
Accounting Standard Interpretation
on Revenue Recognition by Real Estate Developers proposed:
Re-Exposure Draft of proposed Accounting Standards Interpretation
on Recognition of Revenue by Real Estate Developers, issued
by the Accounting Standards Board of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India, has been issued for comment. The issue
of stage at which revenue should be recognized in the case
of real estate developers and colonizers has always been a
contentious issue, not only between the Income Tax Department
and the assessee’s but also among the various players
of the sector. No standardized norm has been laid down and
therefore various companies are following differing policies
in this regard.
The Accounting Standard 9 on Revenue Recognition states as
under, in this respect:-
“In a transaction involving the sale of
goods, performance should be regarded as being achieved when
the following conditions have been fulfilled:
(i) the seller of goods has transferred to the buyer the property
in the goods for a price or all significant risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred to the buyer and the seller
retains no effective control of the goods transferred to a
degree usually associated with ownership; and
(ii) no significant uncertainty exists regarding the amount
of the consideration that will be derived from the sale of
the goods.”
Revenue in case of real estate sales should be recognised
when all the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) The seller has transferred to the buyer all significant
risks and rewards of ownership and the seller retains no effective
control of the real estate transferred to a degree usually
associated with ownership;
(ii) at the time of transfer of all significant risks and
rewards of ownership it is not unreasonable to expect ultimate
collection; and
(iii) no significant uncertainty exists regarding the amount
of the consideration that will be derived from the real estate
sales.
In case of real estate sales, all significant risks and rewards
of ownership are normally considered to be transferred upon
the occurrence of any of the following events:-
 |
| 1. |
Legal
title passes to the buyer (e.g., at the time of the
registration, with the relevant authorities, of the
real estate in the name of the buyer); or |
| 2. |
When
the seller enters into an agreement for sale and gives
possession of the real estate to the buyer under the
agreement. |
| 3. |
When
the seller has entered into an agreement for sale
with the buyer and all the following conditions are
satisfied even though the legal title is not passed
or the possession of the real estate is not given
to the buyer: |
| |
| (a) |
The agreement for sale between the seller and
the buyer is legally enforceable. |
| (b) |
The significant risks, e.g., the price risk,
related to real estate have been transferred
to the buyer. In case of real estate, price
risk is generally considered to be the most
significant risk. |
| (c) |
The buyer has a legal right to sell or transfer
his interest in the property, subject to only
minimal conditions. |
|
When the seller has transferred to the buyer all significant
risks and rewards of ownership, it would be appropriate to
recognise revenue at that stage subject to fulfillment of
other conditions specified in paragraph above, provided the
seller has no further substantial acts to complete under the
contract. However, in case the seller is obliged to perform
any substantial acts after the transfer of all significant
risks and rewards of ownership, revenue should be recognised
on proportionate basis as the acts are performed, i.e., by
applying the percentage of completion method in the manner
explained in Accounting Standard (AS) 7, Construction Contracts.