{"id":1051,"date":"2022-06-06T05:02:51","date_gmt":"2022-06-06T05:02:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/?p=1051"},"modified":"2025-01-30T10:55:42","modified_gmt":"2025-01-30T10:55:42","slug":"indirect-tax-news-letter-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Indirect Tax News Letter\ufeff"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n

GST Calendar \u2013Compliances for the month of May\u20192022<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Nature of Compliances<\/strong><\/td>\r\nDue Date<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-7 (Tax Deducted at Source \u2018TDS\u2019)<\/td>\r\nJune 10,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-8 (Tax Collected at Source \u2018TCS\u2019)<\/td>\r\nJune 10,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-1<\/td>\r\nJune 11,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
IFF- Invoice furnishing facility (Availing QRMP)<\/td>\r\nJune 13,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-6 Input Service Distributor<\/td>\r\nJune 13,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-2B (Auto Generated Statement)<\/td>\r\nJune 14,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-3B<\/td>\r\nJune 20,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-5 (Non-Resident Taxable Person)<\/td>\r\nJune 20,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
GSTR-5A (OIDAR Service Provider)<\/td>\r\nJune 20,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n
PMT-06 (who have opted for QRMP scheme)<\/td>\r\nJune 25,2022<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

ITC refund of unutilized credits is allowed irrespective of duty drawback claim<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0M\/s Numinous Impex (I) Pvt. Ltd. | Madras High Court<\/h5>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Facts:-<\/strong>Petitioner export\u2019s goods as classified under Customs HeadingNo.8483-40-00 of CT Act,1975 and such exports effected by the Petitioner are” zero rated supply” within the meaning of Section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, accordingly, Petitioner had claimed refund of unutilized input tax. Revenue had denied there fund of such unutilized input tax credit under IGSTAct,2017 stating that the Petitioner has claimed duty draw back on the same exports under the provisions of Customs and Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules,2017 read along with relevant Notification as issued under Section 75 of the Customs Act,1962.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Issue<\/strong>:- <\/strong>Whether exports made without payment of IGST under bond on which, duty drawback is claimed under the provisions of the Customs and Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 2017, (formerly 1995) would entitle such an exporter, the benefit of refund of input tax credit under sub-Section (3) of Rule 16 of the IGST Act 2017 r\/w 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with the Rules made there under.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Held:- <\/strong>Hon\u2019ble High Court noted that, the rate of duty drawback for afore-said entry as prescribed vide Notification \u00a0\u00a0No.13\/2016-Customs under Column No.4 (where the CENVAT facility has not been availed)is same as that of Column No.5 (where the CENVAT facility has been availed), i.e., 2%. Hon\u2019ble High Court stated that the expression \u2018Cenvat Credit\u2019 in column 4 and 5 of aforesaid notification is to be read as\u2018 Input Tax Facility\u2019 under the respective enactments and that the Petitioner is entitled to duty drawback at 2% irrespective of the fact that whether the petitioner has claimed ITC under the GST Act. Further Hon\u2019ble High Court held that Para No.2.5 of Circular No.37\/2018-Customs, dated Oct 9, 2018 cannot be pressed to deny legitimate export incentive as same is not sanctioned under law. Accordingly, directed the authorities to scrutinize there fund claims filed by the Petitioner and refund the same together with applicable interest.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

One-third standard deduction as value of land is only optional and not mandatory<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0M\/s Munjaal Manishbhai Bhutt| Gujarat High Court<\/h5>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Facts<\/strong>:-<\/strong> Petitioner had entered into an agreement with Developer for the purchase of a plot of land along and construction of bungalow on the plot. Further, separate and distinct consideration was agreed between the parties to the agreement for construction of bungalow and sale of land; Petitioner bonafidely believed that by virtue of GST laws, he would be liable to pay GST only towards the consideration payable for construction of bungalow in as much as it would constitute supply of construction service under the GST Act; Developer however, informed the Petitioner that he would be liable to pay tax at the rate of 18% under the GST Act on the total consideration i.e., for land as well as construction of bungalow and that he would be eligible for one-third deduction as value of land in terms of Notification No.11\/2017 CT(Rate) dated June 28,2017 as amended from time to time.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Issue:-<\/strong> Whether the impugned notification providing for one-third deduction with respect to land or undivided share of land in cases of construction contracts involving element of land is ultra-vires the provisions of the GST Acts and\/or violative Article 14 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Held: – <\/strong>Hon\u2019ble High Court noted there\u2019s no dispute that sale of land and building are not liable to GST as per the provisions of GST law. Further, that the transaction with respect to the sale of building is taxable qua the construction services unless the entire consideration is received by the supplier after the receipt of completion certificate or first occupation, whichever is earlier. Further, that in the instant case the booking agreement is a part of the record, which specifically provides separate consideration agreed for sale of land and for construction of bungalow.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

No GST under reverse charge mechanism by \u2018importer\u2019 under CIF contracts<\/strong><\/h3>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n
Union of India vs. M\/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd.| Supreme Court<\/h5>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Facts:-<\/strong> M\/s Mohit Mineral\u2019s (Respondent) are importers of coal from various countries and pay customs duties on CIF contract; Respondent aggrieved by Notification No.8\/2017 IT(R) read with Entry No.10 of Notification No.10\/2017 IT(R), which provides for levy of IGST on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism in the hands of the \u2018importer\u2019 had filed a writ petition before Gujarat High Court;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Respondent\u2019s main contentions are enlisted as below:-That the said notifications are ultra vires the GST Acts as taxing importers with GST on CIF contracts shall lead to double taxation on ocean freight; That by virtue of Entry No.10 of the Notification No.10\/2017 IT(Rate) the liability of paying IGST has been shifted on importer and not on the \u2018recipient\u2019, thereby creating a deeming fiction vis-\u00e0-visa taxable event; Hon\u2019ble Gujarat High Court held that the charge on importer in case of CIF value shall not qualify as the \u2018recipient\u2019 of services and that imposing tax on importer importing goods under CIF shall lead to double taxation, thereby held Entry No.10 of Notification No.10\/2017 IT(R) as ultra-vires the provisions of GST Act.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Issue:-<\/strong> Hon\u2019ble Apex Court relied upon Constitution Amendment Act 2016, where in Article 279B was deleted and Article279(1) was included in the Constitution of India, clearly reflecting intention of Parliament that there commendations of GST Council shall have only a persuasive value. Further it noted that Article279A does not begin with non-obstante clause and Article246A does not state that it is subject to the provisions of Article 279A. It stated that to regard there commendations of GST Council as binding edicts would disrupt fiscal federalism, where both the Union and the States are conferred equal power to legislate on GST.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Held:-<\/strong> Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court noted that in a CIF transaction, the foreign exporter contracts with a foreign shipping line. The service of shipping is rendered by the foreign shipping line to the foreign exporter and the consideration is accordingly payable by the latter to the former. However, the cost of such shipping may form a component of the price that is eventually charged to the importer, based on the negotiated terms. Whereas, in case of an FOB contract negotiation, the importer would independently avail of the service of shipping and pay for the consideration. Further, Hon\u2019ble Court noted that Section 13(9) of the IGST Act read with Section 2(93)(c) of the CGST Act inherently create a deeming fiction of the \u2018importer\u2019 of goods to be the \u2018recipient\u2019 of shipping service; Hon\u2019ble Court also stated that it is a settled position that the legislature cannot delegate its\u2018 essential legislative functions\u2019 and that the functions like levy of tax, subject matter of tax, taxable person, rate of taxation and value for the purpose of taxation are essential legislative functions. Further, that the said levy shall form an extra-territorial levy of tax as the supply of service of shipping in a CIF contract is from the foreign shipping line to the foreign exporter and has no territorial nexus to India and does not constitute \u2018supply\u2019 that can be taxed within the provisions of GST Act; Hon\u2019ble Court while dismissing Department\u2019s Special Leave Petition, affirmed the decision of Gujarat High Court and held that the levy of IGST upon \u2018importer\u2019 under CIF contract is ultra-vires the GST statue and lacks legislative competence;<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Recovery of tax in case of search, inspection or investigation to follow the proper legal process<\/strong><\/h4>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

As a fallout of various writ petition\u2019s being filed before various High Courts, where taxpayers have complained about voluntary deposit of tax in form DRC-03 by way of force or coercion, CBIC vide Instruction No.1\/2022-23 GST Investigation dated May 25, 2022, has issued a clarification that recovery of taxes not paid\/short paid can be made under the provisions of Section 79 of the CGST, Act, 2017 only after following due legal process <\/em><\/strong>of issuance of notice and subsequent conformation of demand by the issuance of adjudication order; Thus, there may not arise any situation <\/em><\/strong>where recovery of the tax dues has been made by the tax officer from the taxpayer during the search, inspection and investigation on account of any issues detected during search proceedings. However, the taxpayer is free to deposit any self-assessed tax on a voluntary basis; Pr. Chief Commissioner\u2019s \/ Chief Commissioner\u2019s CGST Zones and Pr. Director-General DGGI has been advised that in case of any complaint is received by a taxpayer regarding the use of force or coercion for getting an amount deposited during search, inspection or investigation proceedings, the complaint is to be enquired at the earliest and in case of any wrong doing on the part of the tax officer disciplinary action be taken against the defaulting officer\u2019s.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

GST Calendar \u2013Compliances for the month of May\u20192022 Nature of Compliances Due Date GSTR-7 (Tax Deducted at Source \u2018TDS\u2019) June 10,2022 GSTR-8 (Tax Collected at Source \u2018TCS\u2019) June 10,2022 GSTR-1 June 11,2022 IFF- Invoice furnishing facility (Availing QRMP) June 13,2022 GSTR-6 Input Service Distributor June 13,2022 GSTR-2B (Auto Generated Statement) June 14,2022 GSTR-3B June 20,2022 GSTR-5 (Non-Resident Taxable Person) June […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1054,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gst-department"],"yoast_head":"\nExport Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Export Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"RNM India Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1-1024x512.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Rnm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Rnm\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Rnm\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c803658b38f2490f6a75863d05644438\"},\"headline\":\"Indirect Tax News Letter\ufeff\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\"},\"wordCount\":1546,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"GST\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\",\"name\":\"Export Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png\",\"width\":6912,\"height\":3456,\"caption\":\"Gst\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Indirect Tax News Letter\ufeff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"RNM India Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"RNM India Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/cropped-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/cropped-logo.png\",\"width\":137,\"height\":72,\"caption\":\"RNM India Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c803658b38f2490f6a75863d05644438\",\"name\":\"Rnm\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/719d6dbaa9fb6a42b8e1c14dec8f0172?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/719d6dbaa9fb6a42b8e1c14dec8f0172?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Rnm\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/author\/rnm\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Export Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules","description":"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Export Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules","og_description":"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/","og_site_name":"RNM India Blogs","article_published_time":"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":512,"url":"http:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1-1024x512.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Rnm","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Rnm","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/"},"author":{"name":"Rnm","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c803658b38f2490f6a75863d05644438"},"headline":"Indirect Tax News Letter\ufeff","datePublished":"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/"},"wordCount":1546,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png","articleSection":["GST"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/","name":"Export Refund Dispute: IGST Act vs. Customs Rules","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png","datePublished":"2022-06-06T05:02:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-30T10:55:42+00:00","description":"Exploring a case involving the denial of refund for unutilized input tax credit under the IGST Act, due to the petitioner's claim of duty drawback under Customs Rules for exported goods.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/gst-1.png","width":6912,"height":3456,"caption":"Gst"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/indirect-tax-news-letter-6\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Indirect Tax News Letter\ufeff"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/","name":"RNM India Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#organization","name":"RNM India Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/cropped-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/cropped-logo.png","width":137,"height":72,"caption":"RNM India Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/c803658b38f2490f6a75863d05644438","name":"Rnm","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/719d6dbaa9fb6a42b8e1c14dec8f0172?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/719d6dbaa9fb6a42b8e1c14dec8f0172?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Rnm"},"url":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/author\/rnm\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1051"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1051"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1051\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1520,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1051\/revisions\/1520"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rnm.in\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}